Review Policy

All submissions will undergo a double-blind peer review process to ensure impartial and high-quality evaluation. This means the identities of both authors and reviewers will remain confidential throughout the review phase. Each manuscript will be assessed by a minimum of two independent reviewers with relevant expertise. Evaluation criteria will include originality, technical accuracy, thematic relevance, and clarity of writing. All reviewers must hold a PhD and be affiliated with a recognized academic or research institution. Individuals interested in contributing as reviewers may reach out to the conference chair. As a token of appreciation, all reviewers will receive an official honorary certificate acknowledging their contribution.